Linang Xiao vs Omar Jasika Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Oct at 04:02 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Xiao vs O. Jasika

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Xiao 1 - 0 Jasika
They have played 2 sets in total, with Linang Xiao winning 2 and Omar Jasika winning 0. The last match between Linang Xiao and Omar Jasika was at the Jinan Challenger, 06-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Linang Xiao getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Xiao | 1 |
| Jasika | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Jinan Challenger(10-06-25)
L. Xiao vs O. Jasika H2H Profile
L. Xiao vs O. Jasika Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Omar Jasika wins 46.93% of points on second serves, while Linang Xiao is slightly better at 47.58%. Does this small difference indicate a decisive advantage? Probably not, but it suggests Xiao's slight edge in this aspect.
- Return Game Edge: Jasika excels in returning second serve balls, capturing 47.38% of points compared to Xiao's 42.73%. Does this give Jasika an upper hand? It appears so, showing Jasika might capitalize more on Xiao’s second serves.
- First Serve Returns: On first serve returns, Jasika has a slight lead, reclaiming 28.64% of points to Xiao's 26.26%. How significant is this difference? Small but notable, indicating marginally better performance against aggressive starts.
- Under Pressure: In high-pressure situations, both players perform almost identically, with Jasika saving 54.58% of breakpoints and Xiao saving 54.59%. Does this parity affect match outcomes? Not significantly, as both players handle pressure similarly.
- Match Win Percentage: Over a year, Jasika's win rate is 57.53%, notably higher than Xiao's 50.00%. Could this indicate a broader superiority in match-winning capability? It strongly suggests so.
- Surface Preference: Jasika prefers Hard surfaces with a 65% win rate, while Xiao shines on Clay at the same percentage. Does surface affect their performance? Yes, but both face challenges on I.hard courts.
- Competitive Level: Jasika frequently competes in higher-level Challenger/ITF tournaments, winning 51.22%, whereas Xiao competes in lower-level Futures/Satellites with a 58.97% success rate. Does this mean Jasika faces tougher competition regularly? Indeed, facing more challenging opponents might better prepare Jasika.
- Quality of Opponents: Jasika faces stronger competitors with an average rank of 345.38, while Xiao competes against players ranked around 454.56. Does this enhance Jasika’s competitive edge? Yes, experience against stronger foes could prove beneficial.
- Deciding Set Performance: If the match goes the distance, Jasika has a 56% success rate in deciding sets, outperforming Xiao's 45%. Could this be pivotal? Yes, particularly for the decisive stages of the game.
Editorial Prediction (October 5, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Omar Jasika and Linang Xiao seems to tilt slightly in favor of Jasika based on multiple performance aspects. Jasika's slight edge in return games and experience with higher-caliber opponents provides him with an essential competitive advantage.
While Xiao’s slight statistical edge in second serve performance is noteworthy, Jasika’s proficiency in returning second serves is likely to neutralize this advantage. Moreover, Jasika's history of competing against more formidable opponents potentially prepares him better for high-pressure matches.
Considering both players manage pressure similarly but with Jasika's slight superiority in deciding sets, should the match extend to the final set, Jasika’s chances further improve. Therefore, based on the current stats and historical performance, Omar Jasika is favored to win the upcoming tennis match.
Linang Xiao vs Omar Jasika Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Xiao vs O. Jasika H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:11:47 | Average Match Time | 1:11:47 |
| 58% (28/48) | 1st Serve % | 70% (38/54) |
| 93% (26/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (24/38) |
| 55% (11/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (7/16) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (23/54) | Return Points Win % | 23% (11/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Xiao Recent Matches Played
O. Jasika Recent Matches Played

L. Xiao vs O. Jasika Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.45% (117/94) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.71% (324/201) |
| 55.36% (258/208) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.70% (720/486) |
| 53.18% (2289/2015) | Games Win/Loss | 53.92% (6011/5136) |
| 55.14% (102/83) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.27% (268/149) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (39/26) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 15.38% (2/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (15/15) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 342 | Aces Total | 1025 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 307 | Total Double Faults | 1077 |
| 1:10:41 | Average Match Time | 1:18:29 |
| 370.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 461.22 |
| 58% (5427/9420) | 1st Serve % | 68% (19769/29045) |
| 66% (3567/5427) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (13031/19769) |
| 51% (2035/3993) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4750/9276) |
| 41% (411/1014) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1358/3045) |
| 41% (3884/9567) | Return Points Win % | 41% (11899/28847) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (6/12) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Masters W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 10.00% (1/9) |
| 36.36% (12/21) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (113/113) |
| 60.47% (104/68) | Futures W/L | 76.60% (203/62) |
| 55% (112/202) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (317/509) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (4/12) |
| 52% (26/50) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (80/142) |
| 44% (22/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (78/148) |
| 88% (120/105) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (312/272) |
| 12% (120/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (312/39) |
| 9% (90/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (212/50) |